🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.